Difference between revisions of "Circluding"
| (33 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | < | + | == Circluding == |
| − | Fanziposter.png | + | |
| − | </ | + | '''Kym Ward feat. Possible Bodies''' |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''This guided tour was performed on-line at ''Possible Bodies Rotation II, Imagined Mishearings'' in Hangar (Barcelona, July 2017) and then again at ''Rotation III, Phenomenal 3D'' in Bau (Barcelona, November 2017) with participants cutting and folding the poster reproduced on the following pages.'''<ref>For another take on “circluding”, see Possible Bodies, “Somatopologies (materials for a movie in the making),” in this book.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class="force-text-indent"> | ||
| + | '''Item 005: Hyperbolic Spaces''' | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Rolling inward enables rolling outward; the shape of life’s motion traces a hyperbolic space, swooping and fluting like the folds of a frilled lettuce, coral reef, or a bit of crocheting.''<ref name="ftn208">Donna J. Haraway, ''Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene'' (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016).</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Item 028: Circluding''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''A new term, one that has been missing for a long time: “circlusion.” It denotes the antonym of penetration. It refers to the same physical process, but from the opposite perspective. Penetration means pushing something — a shaft or a nipple — into something else — a ring or a tube.'' Circlusion means pushing something — a ring or a tube — onto something else — a nipple or a shaft. The ring and the tube are rendered active. ''That’s all there is to it.''<ref name="ftn209">Bini Adamczak, “On Circlusion,” ''Mask Magazine'', 2016, maskmagazine.com.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Item 079: Gut Feminism''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''The belly takes shape both from what has been ingested (from the world), from its internal neighbors (liver, diaphragm, intestines, kidney), and from bodily posture. This is an organ uniquely positioned, anatomically, to contain what is worldly, what is idiosyncratic, and what is visceral, and to show how such divisions are always being broken down, remade, metabolized, circulated, intensified, and excreted. It is my concern that we have come to be astute about the body while being ignorant about anatomy and that feminism’s relations to biological data have tended to be skeptical or indifferent rather than speculative, engaged, fascinated, surprised, enthusiastic, amused, or astonished.''<ref name="ftn210">Elizabeth A. Wilson, ''Gut Feminism'' (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015), 43.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Item 078: Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''If you haven’t got something to put it in, food will escape you — even something as uncombative and unresourceful as an oat. You put as many as you can into your stomach while they are handy, that being the primary container; but what about tomorrow morning when you wake up and it’s cold and raining and wouldn’t it be good to have just a few handfuls of oats to chew on and give little Oom to make her shut up, but how do you get more than one stomachful and one handful home? So you get up and go to the damned soggy oat patch in the rain, and wouldn’t it be a good thing if you had something to put Baby Oo Oo in so that you could pick the oats with both hands? ''A leaf a gourd a shell a net a bag a sling a sack a bottle a pot a box a container. A holder. A recipient.<ref name="ftn211">Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction,” in ''Women of Vision: Essays by Women Writing Science Fiction'', ed. Denise Du Pont, (New York: St Martin's Press, 1988).</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Item 80: Polyvagal Theory''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''The removal of threat is not the same as feeling safe.''<ref name="ftn212">Stephen W. Porges, ''The Polyvagal Theory ''(New York: W. W. Norton, 2011).</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Item 81: Local Resolution''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Phenomena are the ontological inseparability of agentially intra-acting “components”. That is, phenomena are ontologically primitive relations — relations without preexisting relata. The notion of intra-action (in contrast to the usual “interaction”, which presumes the prior existence of independent entities/relata) represents a profound conceptual shift.'' It is through specific agential intra-actions that the boundaries and properties of the “components” of phenomena become determinate and that particular embodied concepts become meaningful. ''A specific intra-action (involving a specific material configuration of the “apparatus of observation”) enacts an agential cut (in contrast to the Cartesian cut — an inherent distinction — between subject and object) effecting a separation between “subject” and “object”. That is, the agential cut enacts a'' local resolution ''within the phenomenon of the inherent ontological indeterminacy.''<ref name="ftn213">Karen Barad, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” ''SIGNS'' (Spring 2003): 815.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Notes === | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class="fullpage circluding right"> | ||
| + | [[File:Fanziposter.png|thumb|none|500px|<noinclude>Fanziposter (recto), Kym Ward, ''Circluding'' (2017) / [[:File:Fanziposter.pdf|Download PDF (8 MB)]]</noinclude>]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class="fullpage circluding left"> | ||
| + | [[File:Fanziposter_verso.png|thumb|none|500px|<noinclude>Fanziposter (verso), Kym Ward, ''Circluding'' (2017) / [[:File:Fanziposter.pdf|Download PDF (8 MB)]]</noinclude>]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="clear: both"></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:50, 12 May 2022
Circluding
Kym Ward feat. Possible Bodies
This guided tour was performed on-line at Possible Bodies Rotation II, Imagined Mishearings in Hangar (Barcelona, July 2017) and then again at Rotation III, Phenomenal 3D in Bau (Barcelona, November 2017) with participants cutting and folding the poster reproduced on the following pages.[1]
Item 005: Hyperbolic Spaces
Rolling inward enables rolling outward; the shape of life’s motion traces a hyperbolic space, swooping and fluting like the folds of a frilled lettuce, coral reef, or a bit of crocheting.[2]
Item 028: Circluding
A new term, one that has been missing for a long time: “circlusion.” It denotes the antonym of penetration. It refers to the same physical process, but from the opposite perspective. Penetration means pushing something — a shaft or a nipple — into something else — a ring or a tube. Circlusion means pushing something — a ring or a tube — onto something else — a nipple or a shaft. The ring and the tube are rendered active. That’s all there is to it.[3]
Item 079: Gut Feminism
The belly takes shape both from what has been ingested (from the world), from its internal neighbors (liver, diaphragm, intestines, kidney), and from bodily posture. This is an organ uniquely positioned, anatomically, to contain what is worldly, what is idiosyncratic, and what is visceral, and to show how such divisions are always being broken down, remade, metabolized, circulated, intensified, and excreted. It is my concern that we have come to be astute about the body while being ignorant about anatomy and that feminism’s relations to biological data have tended to be skeptical or indifferent rather than speculative, engaged, fascinated, surprised, enthusiastic, amused, or astonished.[4]
Item 078: Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction
If you haven’t got something to put it in, food will escape you — even something as uncombative and unresourceful as an oat. You put as many as you can into your stomach while they are handy, that being the primary container; but what about tomorrow morning when you wake up and it’s cold and raining and wouldn’t it be good to have just a few handfuls of oats to chew on and give little Oom to make her shut up, but how do you get more than one stomachful and one handful home? So you get up and go to the damned soggy oat patch in the rain, and wouldn’t it be a good thing if you had something to put Baby Oo Oo in so that you could pick the oats with both hands? A leaf a gourd a shell a net a bag a sling a sack a bottle a pot a box a container. A holder. A recipient.[5]
Item 80: Polyvagal Theory
The removal of threat is not the same as feeling safe.[6]
Item 81: Local Resolution
Phenomena are the ontological inseparability of agentially intra-acting “components”. That is, phenomena are ontologically primitive relations — relations without preexisting relata. The notion of intra-action (in contrast to the usual “interaction”, which presumes the prior existence of independent entities/relata) represents a profound conceptual shift. It is through specific agential intra-actions that the boundaries and properties of the “components” of phenomena become determinate and that particular embodied concepts become meaningful. A specific intra-action (involving a specific material configuration of the “apparatus of observation”) enacts an agential cut (in contrast to the Cartesian cut — an inherent distinction — between subject and object) effecting a separation between “subject” and “object”. That is, the agential cut enacts a local resolution within the phenomenon of the inherent ontological indeterminacy.[7]
Notes
- ↑ For another take on “circluding”, see Possible Bodies, “Somatopologies (materials for a movie in the making),” in this book.
- ↑ Donna J. Haraway, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016).
- ↑ Bini Adamczak, “On Circlusion,” Mask Magazine, 2016, maskmagazine.com.
- ↑ Elizabeth A. Wilson, Gut Feminism (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015), 43.
- ↑ Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction,” in Women of Vision: Essays by Women Writing Science Fiction, ed. Denise Du Pont, (New York: St Martin's Press, 1988).
- ↑ Stephen W. Porges, The Polyvagal Theory (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011).
- ↑ Karen Barad, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” SIGNS (Spring 2003): 815.
